harry potter deathly hallows part 2 full movie

Harry potter deathly hallows part 2 full movie movie#
Harry potter deathly hallows part 2 full movie series#

The revelatory scene and the set pieces both have emotional weight not only due to their content, but because director David Yates has shown himself to be a master of montage.

Harry potter deathly hallows part 2 full movie series#

It's not a matter of 'Everything you know is wrong,' as much as a theme the series has returned to repeatedly since the third movie: 'The simple black-and-white opinions we have about adults as children become shades of grey as we enter into maturity.' Harry, Ron, and Hermoine are honest, open characters and we could always trust them and they could always trust each other, but the world beyond them is far more complex than when they first entered Hogwarts. Where those unfamiliar with the novels may have trouble is a revelatory montage where the audience's belief about two characters is turned on its head. There's one glaring omission in the final battle between Harry and Voldemort that I think slightly diminishes the overall story, but it's a minor annoyance in the grand scheme of how well the second half of the book is adapted. And when it's time to break away from the action entirely for serious drama, the transition is never jarring.įans of the books will be on board for the whole film. The battles are paced so that you really start getting wrapped up in the action, but when matters become too heavy, someone can cut in with a joke or a beloved character can get their shining moment. Part 2 artfully avoids the problem with its tremendous pacing. You can only have wizards shoot spells at each other for so long before viewers begin to lose interest. When you have a battle that covers the majority of the movie's runtime, there's a risk that you will wear out your audience. Instead, it serves as a delicious appetizer to the feast of that is The Battle of Hogwarts.

Harry potter deathly hallows part 2 full movie movie#

But as the movie builds to larger set pieces, you realize that if Gringotts had been outsized as an action sequence, it would throw off the pacing of the other set pieces. Part 2 does have a fun opening action scene where the trio attempts to steal a horcrux from the goblin bank Gringotts, but it wasn't quite as thrilling as I expected. The movie isn't just an endless barrage of set pieces. By contrast, Part 2 is a lean and focused final sprint as the trio hunts down the final horcruxes, major characters complete their arcs, and we come to the deadly showdown between Harry and Voldemort (Ralph Fiennes).Īt two hours and ten minutes, Deathly Hallows – Part 2 is the shortest of all the Harry Potter flicks, but it feels as rich and full as the best films in the franchise. Whereas Deathly Hallows – Part 1 was a slow, deliberately-paced and character-driven narrative that saw Harry (Daniel Radcliffe), Ron (Rupert Grint), and Hermoine (Emma Watson) struggle with their friendship, their lack of direction, and the ongoing war between Voldemort's forces and the rest of the wizarding world.

It is the grandest of all of the Harry Potter films in scope, in action, and in heartbreak. By contrast, Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows – Part 2 is an almost non-stop epic battle that still finds time for the character development and deeply moving moments the series became known for. The first part, while mostly centered on wandering and quiet moments, still managed to work in humor and thrilling set pieces. Both parts of Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows managed to avoid that problem. Financially, it was an unsurprising move, but if you have one movie that's all slow, methodical character development and the second movie that's all fast-paced action, then each movie could be monotonous because they've lost the other half of their story. Rowling's Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows was a risky proposition from a narrative standpoint.